Thanks Linda, I located the kernel message. Is it normal such issues are not tracked in the project's bugzilla: http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Btrfs which only contains 5 bugs ?! On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@xxxxxx> wrote: > Ahmed Kamal wrote: >> >> [root@btrfs progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdb >> ioctl returns 0 >> [root@btrfs progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdc >> ioctl returns 0 >> >> >> /dev/sdb has a btrfs, while /dev/sdc is blank. What's that output >> supposed to mean ? Is it a bug ? > > I think not so much of a bug as not completely implemented. > If you look in /var/log/messages or where every your kernel > messages go, you'll see information about the file system on > the device. At least that's how it worked for me. > > -- ljk >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
