Re: Should i use btrfs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 27 May 2008, Darko Hojnik wrote:
> Yesterday my Reiserfs on an LVM is crashed again. So i have 30 houers
> wasted my time to fix it. Currently i am mooving my Datas to all
> Computers with available free Space in my Network. I thing ist necessary
> to format the Volumes new. That make's my realy sick. EXT3 is good but
> it needs often an Filesystemcheck and by more then 1 TB it's wasting
> Time again. So I have readed something about btrfs. I don't need to use
> LVM because btrfs should have LVM functionality inside. OK i have readed
> that btrfs hasn't an productive Status on this Time but it is realy
> intersting. So i have questions about Dataintegrity. What happens if my
> System gets an Kernelpanic or an other Crash/Mistake and i have to hard
> reset my System? How is the status of Recoverytools

RIght now the btrfs disk format isn't finalized.  So, you will need to 
reformat your volumes a few more times to track btrfs development.

I wouldn't suggest using it yet for production.  XFS and ext3 are going to be 
your two best choices today.

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux