On Friday 2008-05-02 16:38, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 10:34:07AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: >> Thanks, but this uses CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR which isn't enough to tell if >> the kernel has the patch. Lets go back to Jeff's suse patch: > >Do we really need to support kernels compiled with the apparmour patch >applied but not enabled? That would be a custom kernel build, and I get >the impression that people Just Don't Do That -- if they want a newer >kernel, they fetch one from kernel.org. Maybe I'm wrong though. I think so too. Corollary: if there is a distro that has apparmor patched into its kernel, then there is [hopefully] a suitable rpm nearby. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
