Re: [Xcb] [ANNOUNCE] xcb-util 0.3.9 | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 16:41:02 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > Why did "Do not rely anymore on gperf and m4 following removal of deprecated atoms." do this: > > -libxcb_util_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0:0:0 -no-undefined > +libxcb_util_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 1:0:0 -no-undefined > > I don't see this change requiring a major version bump which should > only be done for binary compatibility changes. Yes, you removed the > xcb_atom_get_predefined and xcb_atom_get_name_predefined functions, > but not in a binary incompatible way, so you should not have bumped > the major version which requires relinking every library and > application that links against the library. > How are the xcb_atom_get_predefined/xcb_atom_get_name_predefined removals not binary incompatible?? Cheers, Julien _______________________________________________ xorg@xxxxxxxxxxx: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: list-xorg@xxxxxxxxxxx
[X Forum] [Nouveau Driver] [Devices] [XFree86] [XFree86 Newbie] [Site Home] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Fontconfig] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Video for Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Resources]