Re: LBX? or faster remote X? | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:37:43AM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Keith & Jim's 2003 Usenix paper suggests ssh with compression beats LBX > in most cases: > http://keithp.com/~keithp/talks/usenix2003/ They lie, *especially* for slow links. However, NX is a vastly superior alternative to consider: it's actually usable over modem connections. You won't miss LBX. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bob Tracy | "I was a beta tester for dirt. They never did rct@xxxxxxxx | get all the bugs out." - Steve McGrew on /. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
[X Forum] [Devices] [XFree86] [XFree86 Newbie] [Site Home] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Fontconfig] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Video for Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Resources]