Re: Implementing Render acceleration in the siliconmotion driver | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:12 AM, <currojerez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > I have been experimenting with the sm720 3d engine: I thought I > could implement EXA composite acceleration in this hardware but > it seems to have several drawbacks. > > The triangle engine worked more or less as expected, but the texture > engine only works when fed with images arranged in 16B*8 tiles (this > isn't mentioned in the documentation provided by smi: > ftp://ftp.siliconmotion.com.tw/databooks/ . In fact, the word "tile" > doesn't appear a single time in the datasheet). > This wouldn't be a problem if the rest of graphic subsystems supported > tiled data, or if the conversion could be done in hardware, but it > isn't the case. > The sm722 seems to have the same problem. The sm731 (Cougar3DR) drawing > engine and video processor seem to support tiled pixmaps, but I don't > think I could implement it without access to the hardware. > I wonder if there is some sort of aperture or surface control that will do the translation for you. That's how most hardware with tiled surfaces works. > The second texture engine would be useful to implement masks, but I > can't get it working, it has all the necessary registers, but I don't > think it really has two texture engines ( From the manual: "Trilinear > mip-mapping and texture compositing (multiple texture map) are done in > 2 passes."). > As Roland noted the hw probably handles this internally. > Moreover, it doesn't support any texture format like PICT_a8, I think > (please, correct me if i'm wrong) it is used intensively for things > like antialiased fonts, and it would be one of the main things > composite would accelerate. Seems to support a CI8 texture format. > Probably PICT_a8 masks could be converted in hardware to ARGB, but I > don't think anymore an efficient composite implementation could be > written for this hardware. > Any ideas? the mach64 driver has similar hardware limitations and has a certain degree of render accel: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-mach64/tree/src/atimach64render.c Alex _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
[X Forum] [Devices] [XFree86] [XFree86 Newbie] [Site Home] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Fontconfig] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Video for Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Resources]