[Fwd: xorg Digest, Vol 36, Issue 13] | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
-------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: xorg Digest, Vol 36, Issue 13 Datum: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 08:55:34 -0700 Von: xorg-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Antwort an: xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx An: xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Send xorg mailing list submissions to xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to xorg-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at xorg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of xorg digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: radeon driver and DRI (Adam Jackson) 2. Re: radeon driver and DRI (Florian Echtler) 3. Re: [Patch] AllowEmptyInput with no ServerLayout (Sascha Hlusiak) 4. Re: Tracing Xserver (Matthieu Herrb) 5. Re: Further notes on 7.4 (R?mi Cardona) 6. Re: Further notes on 7.4 (Thomas Dickey) 7. XDMCP / hostname versus IP ? (Jean-Francois Bouchard) 8. Re: error while running Xorg on ARM platform (Mikhail Gusarov) 9. Re: Further notes on 7.4 (Alan Coopersmith) 10. Re: [announce] libdrm 2.3.1 (Fatih A??c?) 11. Re: Further notes on 7.4 (Joerg Sonnenberger) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 09:57:04 -0400 From: Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: radeon driver and DRI To: Florian Echtler <floe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <1215007024.24769.177.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 14:35 +0200, Florian Echtler wrote: > ... and so on until card14. /dev/dri is really empty, although I have > loaded the radeon and drm kernel modules. My kernel is 2.6.22, and the > radeon driver is 6.9.0 .. Your radeon DRM driver may not be new enough to support R500 chips. What does 'dmesg | grep drm' say? - ajax ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:10:40 +0200 From: Florian Echtler <floe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: radeon driver and DRI To: Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxx> Cc: xorg <xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1215007840.10133.9.camel@pancake> Content-Type: text/plain > > ... and so on until card14. /dev/dri is really empty, although I have > > loaded the radeon and drm kernel modules. My kernel is 2.6.22, and the > > radeon driver is 6.9.0 .. > Your radeon DRM driver may not be new enough to support R500 chips. > What does 'dmesg | grep drm' say? [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [drm] Module unloaded Okay, I'm convinced :-) I'll get a more recent kernel.. Thanks, Yours, Florian -- 0666 - Filemode of the Beast ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:15:04 +0200 From: Sascha Hlusiak <saschahlusiak@xxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [Patch] AllowEmptyInput with no ServerLayout To: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <200807021615.10075.saschahlusiak@xxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" > > when not using a layout section in xorg.conf, the function > > checkCoreInputDevices is called too early, when option AllowEmptyInput > > has not been parsed, so I end up with the default keyboard and default > > pointer being added. > > > > The function checkCoreInputDevices is called later anyway so I felt free > > to remove the call in configImpliedLayout. > > In master, checkCoreInputDevices was only called in configImpliedLayout > (was removed ages ago). This patch applies your changes and resurrects > checkInput. AllowEmptyInput is enabled if AutoAddDevices and > AutoEnableDevices is enabled, otherwise it's disabled. I'm pleased indeed. My patch was against xorg-server-1.4.99.905, where I noticed that behaviour. Chance of a backport of your patch? Thanks, Sascha -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20080702/800b0551/attachment-0001.pgp ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:50:04 +0200 From: Matthieu Herrb <matthieu.herrb@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Tracing Xserver To: Mohan Parthasarathy <suruti94@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <486B959C.30403@xxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Mohan Parthasarathy wrote: > Curious, is this possible ? > > thanks > mohan > > > On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Mohan Parthasarathy <suruti94@xxxxxxxxx > <mailto:suruti94@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there a way to trace the functioning of Xserver possibly at > different levels like Terse, Verbose, some > specific subsystems like DRI, EXA etc. Besides being a useful > debugging tool, it would also be useful > to understand different parts of the code interact. the XFree86 DDX provides log functions with a verbosity level. Most drivers implement some DEBUG code that can be enabled to get more output... But all of this it not done in a coherent manner, and the messages may be difficult to understand by someone else than the original developper. The best approach to tracing the X server would be DTrace on Solaris. Sun has already contributed some code to help tracing X, and you may be able to improve it to analyse the specific points you're interested in. -- Matthieu Herrb ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:11:10 +0200 From: R?mi Cardona <remi@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Further notes on 7.4 To: xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <486B9A8E.10907@xxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Dan Nicholson a ?crit : > http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/metacity/trunk/configure.in?view=markup > http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnome-control-center/trunk/configure.in?view=markup > http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnome-keyring-manager/trunk/configure.ac?view=markup > http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnome-mag/trunk/configure.in?view=markup > http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnome-screensaver/trunk/configure.ac?view=markup Fair enough, I was wrong :) > It has to be, after all, > since Xorg isn't the only X implementation, but it is the only one > that uses pkg-config. Is there anyone out there on "recent" systems that doesn't use Xorg libraries? I mean, even OSX ships Xorg Xlib (with .pc files). I'm not sure about Solaris, with their Xsun server, if it had its own implementation of the client-side libs... has this changed with recent Solaris versions? Would it be advisable to tell all those packages to use only pkg-config, ie through a formal deprecation of the AC_PATH_X macros? Just wondering. Thanks -- R?mi Cardona LRI, INRIA remi.cardona@xxxxxx remi@xxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:22:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Further notes on 7.4 To: R?mi Cardona <remi@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <20080702112109.U98349@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, R?mi Cardona wrote: > Would it be advisable to tell all those packages to use only pkg-config, > ie through a formal deprecation of the AC_PATH_X macros? That's the same as advising people to not support programs on anything except the latest desktop-scrapings. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:59:12 -0400 From: Jean-Francois Bouchard <jean-francois.bouchard@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: XDMCP / hostname versus IP ? To: xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <486B97C0.9040702@xxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello ! I am in the process of populating a base image aimed for cloning, a "thin client". We use a recent Xorg (Ubuntu 8.04 updated, 1.4.1~git20080131-1ubuntu9.2) that contain features that we need (xrandr, latest video driver, dual screen support). Everything works great. Our problem : hostname. We like to keep thing very simple (we got mixed architecture here. Making change to the fat server (host) is not a very good idea. I like to set the thin client hostname to localhost. Problem ? The fat server try to talk via hostname to the machine. I like to know if, on the thin client, there would be a way to force to server to use IP instead of hostname. Thank you ! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIa5e/v4JEuWMiR/QRAuKiAJ0TkvezTv1OZi6lDHWFpcfJqGUDhwCeJ/BK thQByTByHSR2eqfhvTpj5wg= =g5yj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:40:03 +0700 From: Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: error while running Xorg on ARM platform To: xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <8763roi9bg.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Twas brillig at 06:34:34 02.07.2008 UTC+00 when eng_azza_kamal@xxxxxxxxxxx did gyre and gimble: AK> The Xorg version that I used is 6.8.2. Please use something recent - there are lots of bugs nobody can remember in such ancient versions as 6.8.*. AK> Have any one succeeded in cross compiling Xorg6.8.2 successfully AK> before and run it on his target board. If so can he please send me AK> that successful sccenario. Have a look at build recipies in OpenEmbedded (http://openembedded.org/), but I suppose they migrated to newer versions long ago. -- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 188 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20080702/5cba43f0/attachment-0001.pgp ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 08:54:25 -0700 From: Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Further notes on 7.4 To: R?mi Cardona <remi@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <486BA4B1.1070209@xxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 R?mi Cardona wrote: > Is there anyone out there on "recent" systems that doesn't use Xorg > libraries? I mean, even OSX ships Xorg Xlib (with .pc files). I'm not > sure about Solaris, with their Xsun server, if it had its own > implementation of the client-side libs... has this changed with recent > Solaris versions? Solaris always used sources based on the X11 releases - while our X client libraries are mostly based on X11R6.4/6.6 in Solaris 8, 9, & 10, we're in the process of replacing them all with the current X11R7.x versions for OpenSolaris and the next release of Solaris. So for us, like for most Linux/BSD distros, you can count on pkg-config if you ride the cutting edge, but still need to handle other methods of finding X libraries on older/stable/enterprise/long-term-supported, but still widely used versions. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith@xxxxxxx Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 18:52:07 +0300 From: Fatih A??c? <fatih@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [announce] libdrm 2.3.1 To: xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xorg announce <xorg-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <200807021852.07949.fatih@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 01 Tem 2008 Sal tarihinde, Dave Airlie ?unlar? yazm??t?: > Update libdrm to 2.3.1. These archives do not include xf86mm.h ? ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 17:55:29 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Further notes on 7.4 To: xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <20080702155529.GA13207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 05:11:10PM +0200, R?mi Cardona wrote: > Would it be advisable to tell all those packages to use only pkg-config, > ie through a formal deprecation of the AC_PATH_X macros? It is already a major PITA that software started to assume that everything has .pc files. Don't make it worse please. Joerg ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg End of xorg Digest, Vol 36, Issue 13 ************************************ _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
[X Forum] [Devices] [XFree86] [XFree86 Newbie] [Site Home] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Fontconfig] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Video for Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Resources]