Re: ati-6.9.0 unstable dualhead

["Alex Deucher" <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Simon Thum <simon.thum@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Simon Thum <simon.thum@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> But 6.9 + 1.4.2 was worst yet. Impossible to use.
>>>
>>
>> Are you saying the xserver makes a difference?  One thing you might
>
> No, that just happens to reflect day-to-day and development instances.
>
>> for your monitor.  A lot of DVI monitors are pretty picky about the
>> timings they like.  if you post your xorg log I'll take a look.  If
>> you see differences between 6.8.191 and 6.8.192/6.9.0 let me know, as
>> I made some changes to the pll code.
>
> Saw that. FWIW, the first start with git ati .192 made my LCD do something I
> never saw: A box telling me that the mode needs to be below 1280x1024/75 hz.
> However this was unreproduceable. Aside from that, it seems to work.
>

Are you saying it's working ok now?

Which log is which?  Does one version of the driver work better than
the other?  You'll notice they are each using different pll dividers:
Xorg.0.log is using:
freq: 108000000
best_freq: 108000000
best_feedback_div: 96
best_ref_div: 12
best_post_div: 2

while Xorg.1.log is using:
freq: 108000000
best_freq: 108000000
best_feedback_div: 16
best_ref_div: 2
best_post_div: 2

Alex
_______________________________________________
xorg mailing list
xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg