Re: XTrap vs. RECORD/XTEST

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 07:27:17AM -0700, Rob Currey wrote:
> From the XTrap manpage ...
> 
> "It is strongly suggested that users of XTrap technology begin developing 
> against RECORD/XTEST as it is the intention of the X Consortium to drive 
> these two extensions in the standards process for providing the protocol 
> capturing/synthesis functionality. Some members of the xtest working group 
> are actively researching migration issues between XTrap and RECORD."
> 
> This leads me to think XTrap is deprecated
> 
> But then I was recently corrected ...
> 
> > From: Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: Wrapping up 7.4 (finally)
> 
> > ... XTrap is absolutely not dead.
> 
> So, Has XTrap been superceeded by RECORD/XTEST?

Sorry, I'm an idiot.  Yes, it pretty much has, but no-one who remembers
this stuff is still alive, so removing it is basically just pending
someone investigating the two to find out if there's anything left in
XTrap ('it's a trap') that needs to be ported to XTest.

Cheers,
Daniel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
xorg mailing list
xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [X Forum]     [Intel Graphics]     [AMD Graphics]     [Nouveau Driver]     [XFree86]     [XFree86 Newbie]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Fontconfig]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux