On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Kristian Høgsberg <krh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Kristian, > > > > I see you already tagged and released xf86driproto-2.0.4 with > > dri_interface.h removed. It might be too late for this, but I think it > > would be better if this change could have a bump in the minor version. > > Bumping the patch number implies that the API hasn't changed, but here > > a massive portion of it has been removed. That's fine since it still > > exists in the stack in Mesa, but people working on a more conservative > > track will inevitably try xf86driproto-2.0.4 + Mesa-7.0.x == no dice. > > > > What do you think about releasing this as 2.1.0 (and possibly a 2.0.5 > > with dri_interface.h back in)? > > I would rather not... dri_interface.h and the XF86DRI prototypes > should not be in a proto module and nothing should rely on it being > there. Does 7.0.x really not compile with this? Mesa has the XF86DRI > prototypes in xf86dri.h in src/glx/x11 and dri_interface.h in > include/GL/internal. Oh, you're right. Nevermind. -- Dan _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg