Re: xf86driproto-2.1.x?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Kristian Høgsberg <krh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  > Hi Kristian,
>  >
>  >  I see you already tagged and released xf86driproto-2.0.4 with
>  >  dri_interface.h removed. It might be too late for this, but I think it
>  >  would be better if this change could have a bump in the minor version.
>  >  Bumping the patch number implies that the API hasn't changed, but here
>  >  a massive portion of it has been removed. That's fine since it still
>  >  exists in the stack in Mesa, but people working on a more conservative
>  >  track will inevitably try xf86driproto-2.0.4 + Mesa-7.0.x == no dice.
>  >
>  >  What do you think about releasing this as 2.1.0 (and possibly a 2.0.5
>  >  with dri_interface.h back in)?
>
>  I would rather not... dri_interface.h and the XF86DRI prototypes
>  should not be in a proto module and nothing should rely on it being
>  there.  Does 7.0.x really not compile with this?  Mesa has the XF86DRI
>  prototypes in xf86dri.h in src/glx/x11 and dri_interface.h in
>  include/GL/internal.

Oh, you're right. Nevermind.

--
Dan
_______________________________________________
xorg mailing list
xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [X Forum]     [Intel Graphics]     [AMD Graphics]     [Nouveau Driver]     [XFree86]     [XFree86 Newbie]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Fontconfig]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux