Re: RandR 1.3 additions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 02:04 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
>  I would argue that connectors
> are a better choice as that's what the user sees.

Right, I want to at least allow the details of the hardware to be hidden
by default and communicate with the user in terms of visible physical
objects.

> 
> the outputs would still handle the detect() functionality, and they
> would choose the encoder.  A driver that didn't want to use the
> encoders abstraction would still work so drivers could gradually
> update or not.

I'm not sure we need anything other than an output property that selects
the desired encoder; is there something extra here?

-- 
keith.packard@xxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
xorg mailing list
xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [X Forum]     [Intel Graphics]     [AMD Graphics]     [Nouveau Driver]     [XFree86]     [XFree86 Newbie]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Fontconfig]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux