On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 02:04 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: > I would argue that connectors > are a better choice as that's what the user sees. Right, I want to at least allow the details of the hardware to be hidden by default and communicate with the user in terms of visible physical objects. > > the outputs would still handle the detect() functionality, and they > would choose the encoder. A driver that didn't want to use the > encoders abstraction would still work so drivers could gradually > update or not. I'm not sure we need anything other than an output property that selects the desired encoder; is there something extra here? -- keith.packard@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg