Igor Mozolevsky wrote: > On 20/01/2008, Andrew Oakley <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The reason for putting drivers back into the server tree seems to be >> knowing when someone breaks a driver compile. Surely we can find >> breakages in the tree with a "continuous integration" type system? >> > > I don't see how moving code from one place to another would make it > better?.. Is Tinderbox > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinderbox_(software)) not an option? > For what it's worth until recently I had a 'master' based tinderbox up and running at: http://tinderbox.freeedesktop.org Pretty simplistic but at least it's something. Slowly I've been fixing things trying to get a simple build.sh to complete. At present it is drivers which break the build. In time I want to provide a proper tinderbox. Cheers, Benjamin _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg