Re: modular -> monolithic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> On 20/01/2008, Andrew Oakley <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> The reason for putting drivers back into the server tree seems to be
>> knowing when someone breaks a driver compile.  Surely we can find
>> breakages in the tree with a "continuous integration" type system?
>>     
>
> I don't see how moving code from one place to another would make it
> better?.. Is Tinderbox
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinderbox_(software)) not an option?
>   
For what it's worth until recently I had a 'master' based tinderbox up 
and running at: http://tinderbox.freeedesktop.org
Pretty simplistic but at least it's something. Slowly I've been fixing 
things trying to get a simple build.sh to complete. At present it is 
drivers which break the build. In time I want to provide a proper 
tinderbox.

Cheers,
    Benjamin
_______________________________________________
xorg mailing list
xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [X Forum]     [Intel Graphics]     [AMD Graphics]     [Nouveau Driver]     [XFree86]     [XFree86 Newbie]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Fontconfig]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux