Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: evdev-1.2.0 / hal-0.5.10 combo broken?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:20:58PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 17:11 Sat 19 Jan     , Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 09:32:48PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > On 15:15 Sat 19 Jan     , Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > I agree, the default should be AutoAddDevices, AutoEnableDevices, and 
> > > > AllowEmptyInput.  I'd recommend distributions make these the default.
> > > 
> > > If so, why aren't they all the upstream defaults?
> > 
> > Mainly just because we can't expect HAL to be installed and functional,
> > but I guess we could just document the change and tell people to suck it
> > up (though complain they will).
> 
> Would it be possible to set the defaults dependent on whether the 
> server's built with HAL support? That way the assumption is just that if 
> they build with HAL, they're using it.

Yep, that's the plan, inasmuch as one exists.

Cheers,
Daniel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
xorg mailing list
xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

[X Forum]     [Devices]     [XFree86]     [XFree86 Newbie]     [Site Home]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Fontconfig]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux