Re: evdev-1.2.0 / hal-0.5.10 combo broken?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:20:58PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 17:11 Sat 19 Jan , Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 09:32:48PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > On 15:15 Sat 19 Jan , Daniel Stone wrote: > > > > I agree, the default should be AutoAddDevices, AutoEnableDevices, and > > > > AllowEmptyInput. I'd recommend distributions make these the default. > > > > > > If so, why aren't they all the upstream defaults? > > > > Mainly just because we can't expect HAL to be installed and functional, > > but I guess we could just document the change and tell people to suck it > > up (though complain they will). > > Would it be possible to set the defaults dependent on whether the > server's built with HAL support? That way the assumption is just that if > they build with HAL, they're using it. Yep, that's the plan, inasmuch as one exists. Cheers, Daniel
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
[X Forum] [Devices] [XFree86] [XFree86 Newbie] [Site Home] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Fontconfig] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Video for Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Resources]