Re: Fragmentation Issue We Are Having |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Fragmentation Issue We Are Having
- From: Brian Candler <B.Candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:19:05 +0100
- Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CADrkzi=JNsbXJHkcb=oOZHLEYMBDUkNHu9O8JFT9h+kSArL47A@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CADrkzimg891ZBGK7-UzhGeey16KwH-ZXpEqFr=O3KwD3qA9LwQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120412075747.GB30891@nsrc.org> <CADrkzi=JNsbXJHkcb=oOZHLEYMBDUkNHu9O8JFT9h+kSArL47A@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 05:09:40PM -0700, David Fuller wrote:
> The total LVM volume group is 4.5 TB. The logical volume is around
> 2.3TB where the mysql data
Hence you have a 2.3TB XFS filesystem? You need inode64. The side warning
"performance sucks" is very true. In particular, if you create a bunch of
files in the same directory, without inode64 XFS will scatter the extents
all over the disk rather than trying to allocate them next to each other
(possibly not a problem if you're only storing mysql data chunks though)
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]