Re: License furor | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 07:05:47PM -0400, William M. Quarles wrote: > Paul Vojta wrote: > >The xf86 1.1 license adds a > >new type of condition that has not been used in open source licenses > >before, and I see nothing wrong with them not wanting to be bound by > >that condition. > > Nothing new, as someone already pointed out, XFree86 1.1 License is very > similar to the Apache 1.1 License. > > http://www.apache.org/LICENSE-1.1 > > Peace, > William Well, yes, very similar, but there is a key difference, as pointed out by Vincent Stemen: http://www.xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-May/004493.html The archives don't show any responses to that message by defenders of the XF86 1.1 license. -- Paul Vojta, vojta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Forum mailing list Forum@xxxxxxxxxxx http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/forum
[XFree86]
[XFree86]
[XFree86 Newbie]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Samba]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Resources]
![]() |