Re: License furor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Vojta wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:19:59PM -0400, mark kandianis wrote:
At 06:39 PM 5/24/2004 -0400, you wrote:
found it man.
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-May/msg05005.html

OK, so I looked there, and read through a lot of messages, consisting mostly of a lot of back-and-forth of the same low quality as you see in this mailing list (present company excluded, of course :-)).

I think references to "the man" might be a little too obscure for at least
some people on this list.  If you're saying that x.org is too strongly
tied to corporate interests, then please point me to where in that thread
you drew that conclusion from.  As I see it, the thread (very slowly)
confirms my preference for x.org over xfree86.


You might want to be read some of the other messages in this thread. I've quoted several times an article from The Inquirer on both this thread and the one on the Fedora list, and someone else explained quite feverently what the problem is with X.org.


Peace,
William
_______________________________________________
Forum mailing list
Forum@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/forum

[Index of Archives]     [X.Org]     [XFree86]     [XFree86 Discussion]     [XFree86 Newbie]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Questions]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [ARM Linux Kernel]     [Samba]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux