Re: License furor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:19:59PM -0400, mark kandianis wrote:
> At 06:39 PM 5/24/2004 -0400, you wrote:
> found it man.
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-May/msg05005.html

OK, so I looked there, and read through a lot of messages, consisting mostly
of a lot of back-and-forth of the same low quality as you see in this mailing
list (present company excluded, of course :-)).

> and i agree with your others point, i don't care for mailing lists, 
> and  x.org etc. is definitely _the Man_
> and it would be snowy day in miami before i supported him.  i don't really 
> go for this corporate bullying
> a bunch of volunteers.  i guess they aren't supplying my mortgage so i 
> don't have to be like those other losers.

I think references to "the man" might be a little too obscure for at least
some people on this list.  If you're saying that x.org is too strongly
tied to corporate interests, then please point me to where in that thread
you drew that conclusion from.  As I see it, the thread (very slowly)
confirms my preference for x.org over xfree86.

-- 
Paul Vojta, vojta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Forum mailing list
Forum@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/forum

[Index of Archives]     [X.Org]     [XFree86]     [XFree86 Discussion]     [XFree86 Newbie]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Questions]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [ARM Linux Kernel]     [Samba]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux