Re: Mission statement and 1.1 license issues | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
John Bradford wrote: [...] > Are you saying that you don't believe that the 1.1 license is > incompatible with the GPL? I say that XFree86 1.1 license is fully compatible with the GNU GPL. A compilation is NOT a derivative work. The distinction is quite obvious. Your car is NOT a derivative work of its gas pedal. Talk to ask your lawyer about "first sale" and "copyright misuse" doctines. regards, alexander. P.S. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/05/01/1052216&mode=nocomment <quote> RMS: We have no say in what is considered a derivative work. That is a matter of copyright law, decided by courts. When copyright law holds that a certain thing is not a derivative of our work, then our license for that work does not apply to it. Whatever our licenses say, they are operative only for works that are derivative of our code. </quote> _______________________________________________ Forum mailing list Forum@xxxxxxxxxxx http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/forum
[XFree86]
[XFree86]
[XFree86 Newbie]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Samba]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Resources]
![]() |