Google
  Web www.spinics.net

and yet another license complaint

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Hi all,

like many others users and developers I would like to express my concern
about the recent license change.

The key issue is obviously that one cannot legally link GPL'ed software
against some major parts of XFree anymore and I cannot think about a
good reason for this situation.

I'm not in the position to say which license is better in terms of "open
source spirit" yet is is obvious that having incompatible licenses will
cause more damage than benefit to the entire OSS community.

On your frontpage you want users to tell their distros that "I want my
XFree86 4.4., and I want it Now !!" - but what good should this be?
A distro without a reasonable windowmanager? No KDE, no gnome, no
windowmaker?

Or what is the real way out of this situation? Ignore each others
licenses?

Udo Rader
CEM 
bestsolution.at

-- 
b e s t s o l u t i o n . a t                        EDV Systemhaus GmbH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
udo rader              technischer leiter/CEM   mobile ++43 699 14243219
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eduard-bodem-gasse 8/3    A-6020 innsbruck      fax      ++43 512 935833
http://www.bestsolution.at                      phone    ++43 512 935834

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[XFree86]     [XFree86]     [XFree86 Newbie]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]
[Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Samba]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Resources]


  Powered by Linux