Re: New licence and driver SDK ?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Ed Cogburn wrote: [...] > The rest of that article does go on to discuss the whole binary module > "problem" with Linux, but the Linksys issue appears to be over, and again, it > happened without anyone challenging the GPL. Aha. So Cisco and others aren't really violating the GPL by distributing products that contain binary only ("proprietary") code linked with the holly GPL'd stuff. Right or wrong? [...] > Again, that is an issue that won't be really decided until the courts weigh in > on what a "derivative work" specifically is, and where the boundaries lie. In the totally perverse FSF'd world your car is a derivative work of its gas pedal. Give me a break. To me, Moglen&Co are bunch of hypocrites. How can the apparent followers of Benjamin Tucker http://www.libertarian.co.uk/lapubs/libhe/libhe023.pdf proclaim on one hand the "triumph of anarchism" http://emoglen.law.columbia.edu/my_pubs/anarchism.html (Anarchism Triumphant: Free Software and the Death of Copyright) and, on the other hand, behave as if they have the right to exclude others who merely link to their stuff? Well, you might want to read various relatively recent court opinions like http://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/125_F3d_580.htm and try to extrapolate it to software and the issue of linking. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ Forum mailing list Forum@xxxxxxxxxxx http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/forum
[Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Samba] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux Resources]