Re: New licence and driver SDK ? | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:26:40AM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > Ed Cogburn wrote: > > [... linking ...] > > > Of course the FSF's lawyers disagree with Rosen. > > FSF is just trying to bluff people. Do you seriously believe that > their claims like http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#OOPLang > could stand in court of law? Uhmm, on a second thought... it could > probably help FSF's lawyers to form the basis for raising the > insanity defense or something like that. The main point is that many if not most of the free software/open source community believes in it. It is not really all that important what one legal system in one country believes, but what the whole group of software authors who contribute code under this kind of licence believe it to be, since after all, it is only them who have the power to sue over it. Friendly, Sven Luther _______________________________________________ Forum mailing list Forum@xxxxxxxxxxx http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/forum
[XFree86]
[XFree86]
[XFree86 Newbie]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Samba]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Resources]
![]() |