Re: License FAQs

[Sven Luther <sven.luther@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 02:38:33PM -0500, mark kandianis wrote:
> At 10:30 AM 2/21/2004 +0100, you wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:05:34AM -0500, georgina o. economou wrote:
> >> I have been working on a FAQ to present this license change as simply
> >> as I can.  I had David review to make sure that I understood the 
> >rationale
> >> and did not say anything outrageous.
> >>
> >> I just committed it and announced on the home page.  It should be up
> >> within the hour on http://www.xfree86.org/legal/licenses.html.
> >>
> >> As always, I look forward to some creative interchange ;-)
> >
> >One thing that would be helpfull clarifying would be : do you consider
> >documentation as software or not. I know there is a bunch of people who
> >consider everything that comes in digital form as software, while other
> >don't.
> 
> i don't think that this is a matter of interpretation sven,
> but copyright law in the us.  the courts treat them separately
> so they are.

Yeah, and the if Bush, in its incarnation as the mighty leader of the
free world say jump in the ravine, we will all blindly follow :))

Sorry, but the world doesn't stop at the US border, and also i think not
everyone is an us legal system expert, so clarification is good, be it
only to stop some ignorant slashdot readers to make misinterpretation of
it and raise a ruckuss because of it, especially given the small cost
involved (around three words i guess).

Friendly,

Sven Luther
_______________________________________________
Forum mailing list
Forum@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/forum