Re: GPL-incompatible license | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Am I correct in my understanding that the problem here is the possibility
that under current, and also previous, XFree86 licensing policy, X
libraries are permitted to contain code under a GPL-incompatible licence,
I may be wrong, since I don't entirely know the XFree86 policies, but
this not how I thought it was.
I thought that the previous XFree86 licensing policy was to use a
specific license, which happens to be compatible with the GPL. That
license did not pose a problem. The problem comes from adoption of a
new license which, as far as I know, was not used in XFree86 before.
and that by addressing the GPL-compatibility of the X library code we
would also be addressing your concerns?
The GPL-compatibility of the license is the whole of my concern. This
is clearly essential for Xlib, since the use of Xlib is to combine it
it with applications, but I don't think the significance is limited
to Xlib.
_______________________________________________
Forum mailing list
Forum@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/forum
[XFree86]
[XFree86]
[XFree86 Newbie]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Samba]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Resources]
![]() |