GPL-incompatible license | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
As the Debian developers have noticed, the new Xfree86 license is incompatible with the GPL. It has to do with the specific requirements about including notices in manuals and documentation. The incompatibility means that linking GPL-covered applications with an Xlib that has this requirement would violate the GPL. The general intention of this requirement does not conflict with the GPL -- for instance, the revised BSD license says something basically similar in a way that is compatible with the GPL. The conflict comes from the specific details of the requirement. The revised BSD license is less specific, so one that simply including the license along with the program satisfies its notification requirement. XFree86 project leaders, if you would prefer (all else being equal) to make the license GPL-compatible, can we work together to investigate whether you can do this and still achieve your other goals? _______________________________________________ Forum mailing list Forum@xxxxxxxxxxx http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/forum
[XFree86]
[XFree86]
[XFree86 Newbie]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Samba]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Resources]
![]() |