Re: Re: Announcement: Modification to the base XFree86(TM) license.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: forum@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: Announcement: Modification to the base XFree86(TM) license.
From: "georgina" <xf86gee@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 21:07:10 -0500 (EST)
Cc: eich@xxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to: xf86gee@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: forum-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

<....heavily snipped....>

Furthermore the GPL doesn't seem to address
the issue of acknowledgement at all.
Instead of declaring this to be a no issue and arguing against it
with practicability reasons it would be more fruitful to discuss
how a valid request for acknowledgement can be handled in an open
source environment in the future.

Egbert.

Which makes no sense when they themselves want credit in the creation of GNU/Linux.I think this discrepancy lays at the heart of the matter.

Regards

G-

Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Announcement: Modification to the base XFree86(TM) license.
  - From: Ryan Underwood

Prev by Date: Re: Re: Announcement: Modification to the base XFree86(TM) license.
Next by Date: Re: Re: Announcement: Modification to the base XFree86(TM) license.
Previous by thread: Re: Re: Announcement: Modification to the base XFree86(TM) license.
Next by thread: Re: Re: Announcement: Modification to the base XFree86(TM) license.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[XFree86] [XFree86] [XFree86 Newbie] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq]
[Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Samba] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux Resources]