RE: XFree86 modularization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "'forum@XFree86.Org'" <forum@XFree86.Org>
Subject: RE: XFree86 modularization
From: Charles Goodwin <charles.goodwin@credit1.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 17:46:38 +0100
Reply-to: forum@XFree86.Org
Sender: forum-admin@XFree86.Org

Title: RE: XFree86 modularization

> Personally, I see every patch that goes into the XFree86 version
> of FreeType that isn't upstream as an argument in the *other*
> direction.

Agreed.

Either you go with Freetype or you fork it and name it differently. You can't have 2 things named the same and releasing differently. Well, you can, but it's not right.

Prev by Date: Re: XFree86 modularization
Next by Date: Re: XFree86 modularization
Previous by thread: RE: XFree86 modularization
Next by thread: I don't manage to launch xfs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[XFree86] [XFree86] [XFree86 Newbie] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq]
[Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Samba] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux Resources]