RE: Discussing issues

["Rich Murphey" <Rich@WhiteOakLabs.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: forum-admin@XFree86.Org 
> [mailto:forum-admin@XFree86.Org] On Behalf Of Kendall Bennett
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 8:36 PM
> To: forum@XFree86.Org
> Subject: RE:  Discussing issues
> 
> 
> "Rich Murphey" <Rich@WhiteOakLabs.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Perhaps you can explain why my assumptions are wrong, rather
> > > than just 
> > > telling me they are wrong? Clearing from this web site 
> > > (updated Jan 1st 
> > > 2003):
> > 
> > No Kendall.  You are full of bullshit.  You denigrate other 
> people's 
> > reputation to further your own goals while refusing to substantiate 
> > your claims.  It is your responsibility to clarify your 
> statements or 
> > be on record as making unsubstantiated claims.
> 
> Rich, the above statement clearly indicates to me that you are an 
> antogonist and not interested in civil discussions. Try to be less 
> paranoid and think that everyone always has an ulterior motive behind 
> what they say.

It profits no one here for me to trivialize 
unfounded assertion at the expense of other's reputation.

You continue to refuse to back up your assertions and in fact
make it clear that you have no intention of doing so.
Your assertions are bullshit Kendall, and your insistence
on maintaining them determines your credibility.

> > Given that you refuse to provide and direct facts to support your 
> > assertions, you have absolutely no credibility whatsoever as a 
> > participant in resolving any issues.  Until you do please 
> don't assume 
> > that anyone can take your statements at face value any longer.
> 
> Sorry, but you don't give yourself any credibility by not 
> responding to 
> my original question. I will state it again for clarity:
> 
> "Perhaps you can explain why my assumptions are wrong, rather 
> than just 
> telling me they are wrong?"
> 
> The facts that I have presented are exactly the facts 
> presented on the 
> Tungsten Graphics web site. If those facts are wrong, then 
> they should be 
> corrected. So far you have not said the facts on the web site 
> are wrong, 
> just that I am full of bullshit. Not exactly an argument of any value.

You draw conclusions from this that you cannot support.
If you have some direct evidence of them provide it, otherwise
you are simply wrong.

You made the assertions, you back them up.

Rich



_______________________________________________
Forum mailing list
Forum@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/forum