Re: Discussing issues | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:22:42 -0400 G A Economou wrote: >Subject: Re: Discussing issues > >On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:11:38 -0400, Havoc Pennington <hp@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 12:46:57PM -0400, David Wexelblat wrote: >>> If Keith had just resigned from the Core Team, gone off and done some >>> stuff, >>> told some people about it, etc, the free market would have taken care of >>> itself. I believe this is the point David, Alan, Mark, a couple of >>> others, >>> have tried to make. >>> >>> This whole governance thing is a smokescreen, IMHO. >> >> So I'd personally like to move past who did what and who is the jerk, >> and simply ask how we are going to ship an X server in the next year >> or so and then regularly after that, which both contains new >> innovations/APIs/features and has good drivers and >> stability/release-process. What is our X implementation going forward, >> and how do we make it good. How do we coordinate all the interests >> here in a way that creates critical mass and a powerful development >> engine. >> >> The reason Keith matters in all this is that there is this long list >> of code next to his name. In practice, if he's gone then so is this >> long list of important contributions. >> >> Now I'm sure someone is going to follow up and say well that's Keith's >> fault, but here is the thing: I don't care whose fault it is, I just >> don't want to be screwed by having to choose between the drivers and >> the features. >> >> Can't someone in the room be the bigger man so to speak, stand up and >> fix the problem. >> >> And then as a side note, why don't we address the X.org relationship >> while we're at it, and just get X cleaned up and fixed as a whole. > >And you Havoc have this power to speak for X.org. To make things happen >there? I mean, you guys can talk all day and make divisions all you want, >but unless someone on the other side can bring it home, this whole >discussion >is meaningless. Speaking for myself, also an active member of X.Org, let me assure you that I am paying very close attention to this debate. I want to know how X.Org can be effective going forward. Leon > >Georgina >_______________________________________________ >Forum mailing list >Forum@XFree86.Org >http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/forum _______________________________________________ Forum mailing list Forum@XFree86.Org http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/forum
[XFree86]
[XFree86]
[XFree86 Newbie]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Samba]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Resources]
![]() |