Re: Discussing issues | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Tuesday 15 April 2003 06:30 am, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > > for the board. The alternative was to define in some way a "large > > enough" contribution. > > What's the matter with defining "large enough" to be "has made > significant contributions over many years"? That sounds like as That's a good spot to start bargaining. Let's change "many years" to "last three months". I know I don't qualify under that metric but I'm willing to work three months for a vote. > good a metric as any, perhaps better than all others. Though I can > pretty much guarantee you that by that definition the vote would > leave pretty much all of the current board and core intact. > It has never been clear to me what purpose the core (as seperate from the commiters) served. As I understand it, the David Dawes is the only board member still active in development. David Dawes has the technical experience and his vision has got the project where it is today. While he may seem grumpy from time to time on this list, that's probably understandable. For what it's worth, I'd vote for you Mr Dawes. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ Forum mailing list Forum@XFree86.Org http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/forum
[XFree86]
[XFree86]
[XFree86 Newbie]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Samba]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Resources]
![]() |