Re: [forum] A Gov Application Developer's Perspective - X Windows future?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
> A start might be an X Server written from the ground up to use native Windows GDI and DirectX > functionality. Adequate OpenGL support has been around for Windows for some time. > When are we going to have similar support for X? I guess it depends if the US government plans to develop it. > to work on ANY CLIENT with ANY BROWSER. Until such time as X Windows is universally available > as a built-in or plug-in for all major browsers and all versions of those browsers, browser compatibility > is an issue. Java has a similar problem, mainly due to Microsoft's obstinacy, but we are getting to > the point that Java works fairly well with IE, Netscape and Mozilla. X Web has not yet achieved > much general acceptance. If you've got java you've got WeirdX (or vnc for that matter). Also tools like weirdmind (ssh client with tunnelled X support). X windows over ssh is a solved problem both freeware and proprietary with support (WiredX) > 7) Development/maintenance costs - The numerous standard X APIs and extensions are so > complex that development and maintenance costs are excessive. IMHO, X needs a serious > house cleaning. Instead of demanding backwards compatibility, the old stuff should be > gradually obsoleted and deleted. Face it, it is becoming tough to find X books anymore > in the computer bookstores because the commercial and government worlds are both > abandoning X for simpler APIs that are more easily applicable to the Web. And modern toolkits. I don't think I've ever touched 'colormap' or many of the other details in the grungy world of X internals since Gtk and Qt grew canvas widgets. Qt has obvious appeal because it works on Windows and on X11 All the major vendors are heading away from Motify/Xt/Xaw thankfully. Alan
[Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Samba] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux Resources]