On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Tommy Pham <tommyhp2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've never tested the difference for performance. If that's the case,
> any particular reason to stop support ISAPI for IIS then? or is
> FastCGI faster than ISAPI for IIS?
It is faster, however the ISAPI was not maintained and has issues. But
what is the relation with Apache?
> I've meant official in the sense that one could download from the
> official/mirror site. Thus it's more trust worthy, in terms of non
> malicious code.
The developers at apachelounge.com work with th Apache project. We
would not recommend to use it if we do not trust this project.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP Home]
[PHP Users]
[PHP Install]
[PHP on Windows]
[Programming PHP]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Rice Cooker]
[Home]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[PHP Books]