Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP] Which versions of Apache will PHP 5.3.6 work with??
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Try third binary instead of official one. Best regards, Sharl.Jimh.Tsin (From China **Obviously Taiwan INCLUDED**) 2011/3/26 Tommy Pham <tommyhp2@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Tommy Pham <tommyhp2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> There used to be a VC6 binary release for PHP v5.3.3 at >>> windows.php.net but I don't see a VC6 build for v5.3 now. ÂAny way, >>> since you're using using Windows, why not just run it as FastCGI? ÂIt >>> runs fine on Win2003 (x86), Win7 x64, Win08 (x86 & x64), and Win08r2. >> >> Apache module works just fine and is in many situations much faster than fcgi. > > I've never tested the difference for performance. ÂIf that's the case, > any particular reason to stop support ISAPI for IIS then? or is > FastCGI faster than ISAPI for IIS? ÂPrior to upgrading to PHP v5.3 and > Windows 64bit, I had faster initial response time from ISAPI. ÂNow > with FastCGI, the initial response takes longer. ÂAs for performance > difference through repeated requests, I don't notice the difference > between ISAPI v5.2 and FastCGI v5.3. > >> >>> Are using a specific Apache module that's why you need to use httpd? >>> If so, you could use the (non official) Apache Lounge's binary. >> >> There are no official builds of Apache, but convenience builds. >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Pierre >> >> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org >> > > I've meant official in the sense that one could download from the > official/mirror site. ÂThus it's more trust worthy, in terms of non > malicious code. > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php