Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: Real VNC Architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


You are right Adam. But how would I integrate this architecture with Real
VNC's XFree86 because the some patches given at
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vnc/  works only for X.org
architecture.

Thanks,
Paresh



On 8/8/08, Adam Tkac <atkac@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 02:53:57PM +0530, paresh masani wrote:
> > Hi Friends,
>
> Hi,
>
> > I came across these architectures while applying the different patches
> like
> > XRANDR,XRENDER, vnc-fb-use to the Real VNC from fedora site
> > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vnc/ and I found that some of
> > these patches only works for X.org. Sorry but I dont have any clue what
> is
> > this architecture. Could any one please let me know how it different from
> > Real VNC's XFree86 architecture.
> >
>
> You can find quick history of X.Org server on
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X.Org_Server. It was forked from XFree
> 4.4 series and now is much more better than original XFree. Vast
> majority of OS vendors uses X.Org as default X protocol implementation.
>
> Base architecture was similar in early X releases (7.0, ...) but
> current X has many differencies from original XFree.
>
> From my point of view RealVNC doesn't care about free vnc edition
> so this is main point why it still uses old XFree. I can't see any
> advantage of this approach.
>
> Adam
>
> --
> Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
>
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
VNC-List@xxxxxxxxxxx
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list

[Books]     [Home]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Hot Springs]     [VNC Home]     [PDAs]     [Open Source Now]     [Epson Inkjet]

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Powered by Linux