Re: MPU Problems with e100 and VLANs | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Hi, On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 08:13:18AM +0200, Emil Micek wrote: > I installed a switch just behind the router and configured it to mirror > the port to which the router is connected. > > I then connected win-xp laptop to the port to which the traffic from the > router was mirrored and the sniff is from WireShark installed on the > Laptop. Are you sure the switch is acting correctly? I mean: the switch also has to pad the packets to the correct size. If it removes the vlan tag it *has* to add padding to the packet. Switches, how stable they seem, are known to have bugs. These switch bugs are known to occur: - drop packet since payload without tag is < 64 bytes - After removing tag forget to pad to 64 bytes. The e100 is known to pad (hardwarewise) to the correct minimal payload of 64 bytes. -- begin LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.txt.vbs I am a signature virus. Distribute me until the bitter end _______________________________________________ Vlan mailing list Vlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.candelatech.com/mailman/listinfo/vlan
[Site Home] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Memory] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux Resources]