Hi Mauro, I have a series of two patches, of which the first _amends_ a pxa-header, creates a header under drivers/media/video/, and changes pxa_camera.c to include the new header: arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa-regs.h | 95 ----------------------------- drivers/media/video/pxa_camera.c | 2 + drivers/media/video/pxa_camera.h | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/media/video/pxa_camera.h and the second one is based on the first: it only touches files under drivers/media/video, but needs results of the first one: drivers/media/video/pxa_camera.c | 204 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- drivers/media/video/pxa_camera.h | 95 ------------------ 2 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 137 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 drivers/media/video/pxa_camera.h (yes, it deletes drivers/media/video/pxa_camera.h again... No, I don't like it either) I acked the first one and it is going to be merged over the ARM tree, the second one we should merge ourselves. Shall we wait until the first one is in "next", so we can resync with it and then push the second one or how would you prefer to do this? Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list