Re: gspca-sonixb and sn9c102 produce incompatible V4L2_PIX_FMT_SN9C10X

[Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx>]

JoJo jojo wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 1) Fix the gspca driver and libv4l to produce / expect BGGR bayer inside the
> > V4L2_PIX_FMT_SN9C10X data, making gspca compatible with the already released
> > in an official kernel sn9c102 driver. The downside of this is that we loose
> > all the testing done with gspca (both v1 and v2) with the current gspca
> > settings but given that windows uses the sn9c102 settings I don't expect
> > much
> > of a problem from this (and I can test the new settings for 3 of the 7
> > supported sensors).
>
>
> What are the other 4 USB ids of sensors that you can't test yourself?
> Maybe we can help.

We could use testing for the following usb-id's:

        {USB_DEVICE(0x0c45, 0x6007), SB(TAS5110, 101)}, /* TAS5110D */
        {USB_DEVICE(0x0c45, 0x6009), SB(PAS106, 101)},
        {USB_DEVICE(0x0c45, 0x600d), SB(PAS106, 101)},
        {USB_DEVICE(0x0c45, 0x6019), SB(OV7630, 101)},
        {USB_DEVICE(0x0c45, 0x6024), SB(TAS5130CXX, 102)},
        {USB_DEVICE(0x0c45, 0x6025), SB(TAS5130CXX, 102)},
        {USB_DEVICE(0x0c45, 0x6028), SB(PAS202, 102)},
        {USB_DEVICE(0x0c45, 0x6029), SB(PAS106, 102)},
        {USB_DEVICE(0x0c45, 0x602c), SB(OV7630, 102)},
        {USB_DEVICE(0x0c45, 0x602d), SB(HV7131R, 102)},
        {USB_DEVICE(0x0c45, 0x602e), SB(OV7630, 102)},
        {USB_DEVICE(0x0c45, 0x60af), SB(PAS202, 103)},

Which should currently be supported, we are also interested in any cams with a 
usb-id matching: 0c45:60?? or 0c45:61??, some may just need to right entry 
added to the usb-id table, while others may require adding some code.

Thanks & Regards,

Hans

--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list