- Subject: Re: VDR form packages
- From: Marx <acc.for.news@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 18:45:05 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAA7C2qjczHusWTvnkxjaK+g3U=TZVK+rEA2vAP-NVrS0Su0Z7w@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <refn79-aeh.ln1@wuwek.kopernik.gliwice.pl> <CAA7C2qjczHusWTvnkxjaK+g3U=TZVK+rEA2vAP-NVrS0Su0Z7w@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
I'm not as good in writing scripts as you :) Do you install VDR from
sources, or build debian packages?
I know it's not so hard to build everything manually and in fact I did
it many times. Hovewer packages in yavdr or e-tobi repositories were
easier to install, and it was sure they will work together. Sometimes
VDR or packages are patched to work better by maintainer of repo. I
don't need to follow all git svn of all plugins and cope with some
problems of compiling it myself, if somebody did it. I think it's better
to use his work because it's better in it and additionally i test his
work. Sometimes I'm in hurry to test some "super new plugin". Aptitude,
search, install, restart vdr and test - it gets a few minutes and
afterall it's easy to unistall it too. And while new version of VDR is
published, i simple aptitude, update and go - I have new version with
all new plugins.
That's why I like having VDR in packages.
Knowing that Debian has "master od VDR" ;) in his team is very good info
and I will try to stick with this version
Marx
_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
[Linux Media]
[Asterisk]
[Photo]
[DCCP]
[Netdev]
[Xorg]
[Util Linux NG]
[Xfree86]
[Devices]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Fedora Users]
[Webcams]
[Fedora Women]
[ALSA Devel]
[Linux USB]