Re: Local frontend - using XBMC strm vs vdr-sxfe
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On 2012-03-09 16:34, Bio H wrote:
i also have struggled for this holy grail xbmc would really be the ideal interface for me (just cant beat this flexibility - try playing a .bin / .img over a network which is .rar'd - cant do this on vdr) i like the xbmc plugins and flexibility, for the most part. :) for last few months i've been trying xvdr, but i have to say i have mixed feelings/results on this, and it's not very stable (from my experience) the deprecated vnsiserver/client has fallen off the radar by now... not many options other than streamdev/strm files. i found i kept getting warnings about insufficient buffers with the setting engine.buffers.video_num_frames:22 , so i bumped that up to 35
I got the warnings, too, but ended back at 22 when it didn't make a visible difference. This is on an Atom box with scarce resources, so ymmv.
only other setting i'd suggest re-examining is the engine.performance.memcpy_method:libc at least on my system, kernel is faster. :) autodetect should be fine for this... ? (it should test all of them)
I started out with auto detect but then set it to libc which it selected. The start up delay for auto is probably small, so I guess it's a safe bet in most cases.
Cheers, Jonas _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
[Linux Media] [Asterisk] [Photo] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Xorg] [Util Linux NG] [Xfree86] [Devices] [Big List of Linux Books] [Fedora Users] [Webcams] [Fedora Women] [ALSA Devel] [Linux USB]