| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Hello, On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 12:13:16AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > That looks reasonable to me, not being expert on the ia64 details. > I rolled that into utrace-regset-ia64.patch in the 2.6.22 backport version. > > > patch is against latest utrace source (2.6.22 base + utrace patches) > > The latest utrace source is based on 2.6.23-rc2, and your patch does not > apply there. TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME has been renamed to TIF_PERFMON_WORK. > So you need to rename it back (or to something else) to overload it. > Yes, in 2.6.23, TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME has been removed because it was not used except for perfmon, thus I renamed it. The problem is that you cannot just override it because you would need a way to further demultiplex the reason for call do_notify_resume(). Perfmon not simply relies on the TIF_PERFMON_WORK bit being set. As you realize now this flag would mean you have some RSE work or some perfmon work. -- -Stephane