Re: my support in utrace.
- Subject: Re: my support in utrace.
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
- Emacs: it's all fun and games, until somebody tries to edit a file.
- In-reply-to: Andrea Gasparini's message of Saturday, 28 July 2007 16:51:50 +0200 <200707281651.50750.gaspa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> - after that: i would take under my hands the uml port of utrace, do you
> know if some work has already done?
Jeff Dike expressed interest in doing it, but I don't think he has done any
of the regset work. What's there now (in utrace-tracehook-um.patch) is
just the tracehook branch part of the work, which is enough simply to get
UML to compile and work again with CONFIG_UTRACE=n (and hence, no ptrace).
UML is different from a normal port, because it is not an architecture
itself, but is a different variant port of each other architecture. The
regset details are already chosen for each arch, and just need to be
implemented compatibly in the UML context.
> In order to take a look i just imported roland git repository. I found that
> there isn't any master branch (which in all tutorial/howto is the default
> when you clone a repository).
> It don't give to me problem, just curious.
I am no great expert on git, and even less when I started with it. The
git.fedoraproject.org servers don't let me do much other than push heads,
so I cannot easily clean up the repository there like I clean up my own
local repositories. The right thing would be to have a refs/heads/master
there is a symbolic ref for refs/heads/utrace-ptrace-compat.
Thanks,
Roland
[Fedora]
[Kernel Discussion]
[Red Hat Install]
[Red Hat Watch]
[Red Hat Development]
[Free Online Dating Site]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Campsites]