Re: [PATCH] fdisk: fix segfault on bsd label

[Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 07:08:30PM +0200, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 15:53 +0200, Francesco Cosoleto wrote:
> > 2012/5/4 Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxx>:
> > > From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Commit 8db8295d824cd0c8cba9385e4635d6e311d69d3f added a regression that causes the program to crash when
> > > touching the partition structure (pte) for BSD/OSF labels. Since DOS has its own initialization function,
> > > allow BSD labels to use it as well.
> > >
> > > Steps to reproduce:
> > >
> > > $> fdisk bsd.img (obtained from blkid regression test files)
> > > Command (m for help): p
> > > ...
> > > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> > > Disk identifier: 0x00000000
> > >
> > > Segmentation fault
> > 
> > Thanks Davidlohr for pointing out that regression. Does it occurs with
> > the command to print the partition table when the drive has a BSD
> > label and hasn't a valid DOS label, and it has no partition? Fdisk
> > switches from BSD label to DOS label without initializing DOS
> > structures, right?
> 
> From my analysis, yes.

 Just note that some labels are nested -- for example BSD, minix
 unixware, ... are subtypes (nested partition tables) within DOS.

 This parent->child relationship will be also necessary to support
 in new fdisk API.

    Karel


-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html