Re: eject on Cygwin?

[Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:49:37AM +0200, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> Karel Zak wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:31:11AM +0200, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> > > Is there a specific reason for this line in configure.ac?
> > >   UL_REQUIRES_LINUX([eject])
> > > 
> > > Can't Cygwin handle /dev/scd0 correctly? 
> > 
> >  I don't know, the code also depends on /sys to detect if the device
> >  is removable, it calls umount(2) syscall, etc.
> 
> okay, thanks.
> Anyway, porting u-l to cygwin is not much fun anymore,
> e.g. due to new close_stdout() which needs __fpending, and
> lib/randutils.c needs sys/syscall.h to check if __NR_gettid
> is defined etc.

It should be so pretty simple to check for the unportable functions
in configure and add some #ifdef to include/closestream.h. It's no
problem if close_stdout() will do nothing on some platforms. Sami?

Anyway, we follow coreutils here, I guess coreutils already have some
fallbacks (they care about portability more that u-l :-).

    Karel


-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html