|
|
|
Re: [pull] chkdupexe, a bug, version numbers and bashisms | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Merged, but
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 08:27:01PM +0100, Sami Kerola wrote:
> Sami Kerola (31):
> chkdupexe: reimplement command in C
please, send the new chkdupexe to mailing list for review.
> addpart: align with util-linux coding standards
> delpart: align with util-linux coding standards
Fixed...
if ((fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY)) < 0)
err(EXIT_FAILURE, "%s", argv[1]);
...
err(EXIT_FAILURE, "BLKPG");
"%s", "BLKPG" are not usable error messages.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Site Home] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Memory] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux Resources]