Re: non-linux support | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Karel Zak, le Tue 22 Apr 2008 13:22:32 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:12:45AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >
> > +#ifdef __linux__
> > static ssize_t
> > read_lastoddsector(int fd, uint64_t lba, void *buffer, size_t count)
> > {
> > @@ -148,6 +149,7 @@ read_lastoddsector(int fd, uint64_t lba, void *buffer, size_t count)
> >
> > return !rc;
> > }
> > +#endif
> >
> > static ssize_t
> > read_lba(int fd, uint64_t lba, void *buffer, size_t bytes)
> > @@ -159,6 +161,7 @@ read_lba(int fd, uint64_t lba, void *buffer, size_t bytes)
> > lseek(fd, offset, SEEK_SET);
> > bytesread = read(fd, buffer, bytes);
> >
> > +#ifdef __linux__
> > /* Kludge. This is necessary to read/write the last
> > block of an odd-sized disk, until Linux 2.5.x kernel fixes.
> > This is only used by gpt.c, and only to read
> > @@ -166,6 +169,7 @@ read_lba(int fd, uint64_t lba, void *buffer, size_t bytes)
> > */
> > if (!bytesread && !(last_lba(fd) & 1) && lba == last_lba(fd))
> > bytesread = read_lastoddsector(fd, lba, buffer, bytes);
> > +#endif
> > return bytesread;
> > }
>
> Can't we use #ifdef BLKGETLASTSECT rather than __linux__?
We can indeed.
Samuel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Site Home] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Memory] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux Resources]