usb_sl811.h versus usb/sl811.h

["Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

  curious:

$ grep -r "include.*sl811" *
arch/blackfin/mach-bf537/boards/pnav10.c:#include <linux/usb_sl811.h>
arch/blackfin/mach-bf537/boards/generic_board.c:#include <linux/usb_sl811.h>
arch/blackfin/mach-bf537/boards/stamp.c:#include <linux/usb_sl811.h>
drivers/usb/host/sl811_cs.c:#include <linux/usb/sl811.h>
drivers/usb/host/sl811-hcd.c:#include <linux/usb/sl811.h>
drivers/usb/host/sl811-hcd.c:#include "sl811.h"

-rw-rw-r-- 1 rpjday rpjday 706 2007-08-28 06:11 ./include/linux/usb_sl811.h
-rw-rw-r-- 1 rpjday rpjday 701 2007-08-28 06:11 ./include/linux/usb/sl811.h

  i'm assuming one of those is redundant, yes?

rday
-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Linux-usb-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users