| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Hi Andreas, I ran tux with RH9 (kernel 2.4) and it was rock solid, not a single crash on my overloaded system. It managed to get more than 80 days of uptime before shutting down for maintenance purposes. Now I use FC2/3 with kernel 2.6 and it have been blocking on me under heavy load. I am working with Ingo to try to solve this but I have been unable to test the latest kernel for different reasons. Tux is really really great. Could you test RH9 or FC1 and see if it is stable enough? (FC1 uses a 2.4 kernel so it should be stable). -William El jue, 03-02-2005 a las 01:07 +0100, Andreas escribi� Hi all! > I've tried TUX in 1993, and the performance was good, but stability > terrible. > I am just about to give it a try again, and just run into a kernel- > panic when I did a > > service tux stop > > Please reply and tell us how you are running tux, or how you used to > run it. > Alone, or with an apache at port 8080? > Tux 2 or 3? > Kernel 2.4 or 2.6? > > Cheers, Andreas > _______________________________________________ > > tux-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tux-list
[Older Fedora Users Mail] [Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [iPod Nano] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]
