| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:49:54AM -0600, joshua.schnee@amd.com wrote: > Thank you for responding, > > I am unaware of any patch that has been ported to 2.4.19. Is there a ported patch available somewhere? I thought someone had made one... > Yes I had several hunks fail, but as this is not my area of expertise, I am unable to create a work around. Then that is likely the source of your problem... > Only Logging, and redirect_logging are enabled, from reading past archive messages I had thought that referer_logging was causing the errors. Should I disable all logging? I wouldn't worry about it at this point, hunks failing is in my best guess the source of the problem. Check the archives for the link to my patch against 2.4.21-pre2. Download and unpack it, and change the following: -at line 1674, delete the three lines reading: EXPORT_SYMBOL(yield); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched); EXPORT_SYMBOL(jiffies); and add three lines reading: EXPORT_SYMBOL(sys_sched_yield); EXPORT_SYMBOL(jiffies); EXPORT_SYMBOL(xtime); Then run the modified patch against vanilla 2.4.19. It should patch without any hunks failing. The previous suggestion of 2.4.19-aa may work, I have not tried it myself, and do not run SuSE, so I cannot say. -- Shane Allen <shane@sell.com>
[Older Fedora Users Mail] [Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [iPod Nano] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]