| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Hi All, I am a rather new user of Tux, I have installed and configured it as in tux.readme. Now when I go to start it using 'tux start' it says "Cannot allocate memory: no RAM" Can anybody please suggest ? I am using redhat 7.2 and Tux 2.1.0-2. regards Amit -----Original Message----- From: Adam Goldstein [mailto:whitewlf@whitewlf.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 1:18 AM To: tux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: Tux serving graphics only Does anyone here have experience getting tux to work on a recent Mandrake installation? Such as Mandrake 9.0, 9.1 or 9.2? Last time I tried, it would not recompile the kernel with tux enabled... though, I am unsure if the mdk kernels have included or discarded the tux code in the past couple revisions. One of my customers is running a very high volume website, 65-75million hits/month (~10million page views) with heavy images and php mysql calls. The server is a dual athlon 2000+ w/3.5G ram, U160 73G raid for main pages&images and 36G 15K U160 for mysql. The server is steadily slowing down under the user load and main partition becoming full of images (1-300MB/day incoming, only small% being removed...). Apache2.0.44, php4.2.3, mysql4.0.13, Mandrake 9.0 Would tux help in this situation, or just suck more precious resources for a small% gain considering that 95% of the pages are dynamic mysql? We are actively trying to move to a multi-server setup, but that will take some time to implement. On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 03:58 PM, Vecchio, Peppi wrote: > > I'm still learning about tux and how it works. Haven't implemented it > yet on a production box. But here's a question: Since I'm using > Linux/Apache and Apache performs better when it doesn't have to handle > serving graphics, would it be wise to use tux to serve the graphics? > I was hoping that if Apache still did all the .html file requests, I > wouldn't have to change any log file program configurations. Tux > could carry the load with the graphics and the overall system would > respond better. > > Anyone have any thoughts on this? Anything would be appreciated. > Thanks for the help. > > Peppi Vecchio | Web Developer > TECHNOLOGY SERVICES GROUP > ORANGE LAKE RESORT AND COUNTRY CLUB > > _______________________________________________ > > tux-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tux-list > > > _______________________________________________ > > tux-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tux-list > -- Adam Goldstein White Wolf Networks http://whitewlf.net
[Older Fedora Users Mail] [Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [iPod Nano] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]