| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
i have observed apache running on solaris to perform roughly as well
as tux + apache on linux, for my applications. so if you can afford
sun hardware, i welcome you to try that as an alternative.
i am also concerned about the lack of development on tux, but it works
nicely for me right now.
On 10/15/02, Safedin Kajoshaj <safedin@ameritech.net> wrote:
> Reading the latest activity on the list, I am starting to wonder if it
> is wise to use Tux. Just some impressions that I am getting, hope
> someone on the list can correct me, but it seems that:
>
> a) Tux has a few problems that are hanging around, and it's doesn't seem
> like anyone is fixing it.
>
> b) There isn't any work being done on Tux currently.
>
> I am on Red Hat 8.0, and for me Tux has proven to be fast/reliable. I am
> only serving up static pages/images. I haven't run into any problems
> with it. Just some things I wanted to ask.
>
>
> TIA
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> tux-list@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tux-list
--
steve simitzis : /sim' - i - jees/
pala : saturn5 productions
www.steve.org : 415.282.9979
hath the daemon spawn no fire?
[Older Fedora Users Mail] [Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [iPod Nano] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]