Re: Why are we still using trn?

[dalgoda@ix.netcom.com (Mike Castle)]

In article <20030128212615.C25694@mammoth.ca.caldera.com>,
Bela Lubkin  <belal@caldera.com> wrote:
>Mike Castle wrote:
>> Larry used to threaten to rewrite trn in perl.  There are certainly enough
>
>Not trn, rn.  Perl started out as a tool in which to write the Next
>Generation rn.  Then it, uh, went cancerous...

ACK!

I meant to write rn, but my fingers wouldn't let me.

grrrr

-- 
     Mike Castle      dalgoda@ix.netcom.com      www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
    We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan.  -- Watchmen
fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com